Types of Cell Phone Music

The first cell phone piece that comes to mind is Golan Levin’s Dialtones (A Telesymphony) (2001). The sound source is the audience’s ringtones on cellphones. Participants download a ringtone and get an assigned seat. The performer is a team that has a switchboard that can call up to 60 or so numbers at the same time. So this is still very much the model of composer writes song, performer plays instrument, but here the instrument is spatially spread out over the audience. The audience role is a little blurred in that they get to be seated in the orchestra, so to speak.

The second model for cell phone performance coming to mind is similar in approach: David N. Baker’s Concertino for Cellular Phones and Symphony Orchestra. One composer, orchestra with four amplified cell phones, and then moments in the piece where the audience is encouraged to make their cell phones beep and ring. Here, the model is not all that different from other audience participatory pieces from various genres and performance scenarios: composer writes piece, select group of performers do the heavy lifting for the piece, but the audience is invited to carry out a simple but fun task to make the piece interactive. I’ll need to come up with some key examples, but I’m thinking of stuff like radio shows or melodramas where the audience is asked to boo when the villain appears.

The next model I have in mind is slightly more traditional, I think, than the previous two, despite the novelty of new instruments: Ge Wang heads Standford’s MoPhO (Mobile Phone Orchestra), which generally does a traditional ensemble setup of a conductor, with a group of performers. The performers hold iPhones and have special speakers mounted on their wrists, and perform pieces written by members of the ensemble.  I’ve yet to attend one of their concerts, which now seem to be occurring at ends of fall and spring semesters, but it seems like they do all sorts of pieces that leverage the iPhone’s capabilities.  It may be that there are some instances where the performance model is quite different than composer -> performers on iPhones with audience watching.

Another approach to the mobile phone ensemble is kind of like the game telephone.  A sound is passed from one person to the next via some kind of network.  This type of performance improvisation has been happening for decades, and was one of the first ways to make computer music have some live performance aspect to it (the original network band, The Hub, comes to mind).  I think MoPhO’s December 2009 concert included a piece with this aspect.  At any rate, this game of telephone is closely related to the way computer music was first developed:  in the 1950s and 60s Max Mathews created a modular program  featuring a tool box of ‘unit generators’ that simulated oscillators, mixers, amplifiers, and similar audio modules.  The signal (imagine it as a sound) would go through a series of linked unit generators to modify the sound as it passed from one unit to the next.  It’s the basis for one of my favorite audio tools, Max/MSP.  In terms of performance, an ensemble of performers can play this game live to act as agents that modify sounds, but instead of having automated mechanisms to change the sound, people can react to what they hear and alter it, often bringing personality, spontaneity, humor and irony into the flow of signal processing.

Perhaps a corollary to the ‘telephone’ game concept would be the mash-up.  A real blurring of composer and audience occurs with this idea, where the person listening to the prepared content is invited to alter it and use it in their own music.  Splice musicRjDj, and ccMixter are the first things that come to my mind with this, though there’s an entire culture around this way of making music that I cannot pretend to know enough about.  Please, if you’re reading, show me the way.

I’ve yet to really give this group a look, but I get the impression based on this video that the model for mobile music making here is a little more inclusionary and immediate, where the audience participants are the performers.  This is something of interest to me compositionally.

A whole different category for smart phones in general is the use of handsets for personal performance (like Smule’s Ocarina) and amusement.  A lot of the apps out there have a collaborative aspect to it (I’m thinking about RjDj again), but for the most part, these music apps are used mostly for diversion in an isolated setting and not in group performance.

Then there are apps designed for music education, intended in most cases to help you learn to play a different instrument (keyboard or guitar) or learn some basic music theory.

I haven’t touched on ring tones much, but there’s someone who does named Sumanth Gopinath.  Great article by him called Ringtones, or the auditory logic of globalization.

And of course, I’m neglecting perhaps the most obvious use of mobile phones in musical contexts, which is to use it as an mp3 player.  I find these two links (here and here) to be relevant to this discussion, but it’s another discussion entirely, so I won’t get into it now.

I know I’m forgetting a lot of other things that have been done (for instance, I know that UMichigan has an iPhone ensemble too), so to all you few readers out there: please point out errors or bring me up to speed with other developments of performance.  Specifically, I’m interested in knowing how mobile phones are used musically, who is doing what: composer/audience/performer/mash-up artist/

Artists and Patronage in the 21st Century

One band that has managed to rise along with the growth of Youtube is OK Go.  But their label, EMI, felt like it wasn’t a good way to earn a return on their investment to have the video available to be viewed (and embedded) for free.  Damian Kulash of OK Go was interviewed a few weeks ago on NPR talking about ditching their label so they could continue to make viral videos (and allow someone like me to embed their video on a site like this).

OK Go’s latest video (must see):

The thing that interests me about this is to see how old business models are reinvented through changing social trends and practices.  It’s not so much that OK Go has parted with their label, but that State Farm Insurance stepped in and sponsored this video.  Kulash mentioned in the NPR interview that this is more like an artist/patronage relationship similar to 17th century visual arts.  In Kulash’s words, “We got to do what we wanted to do, and we put a thank you on the end, and that’s it.”

Thanks to their reputation of creating viral videos, OK Go has enough views and new fans (ranging from an extremely wide audience – I learned about OK Go because my Dad forwarded a link to the treadmill video) to sustain themselves through downloads and online chirp.  At least that’s their current business model.  But that’s not the entire picture, since they seem to be finding a sweet spot where sponsors come in and want to associate themselves with what’s trendy online.

It makes me wonder about Beethoven’s patronage, for example.  I used to think that patrons would donate money and support artists out of generosity, genuine interest in promoting the arts, and spreading the wealth.  It never occurred to me that patrons would also be giving as a means of self-promotion and branding identity.  I suppose it depends on the patron.

Today, I marvel at the way in which OK Go has managed to maneuver its way to what seems like a perfect balance of monetary success coupled with tremendous creative freedom (and resources).  It’s not so much that the band got to this artistic nirvana, but how it evolved and when.  Not only was it lucky timing to come up with a viral video just as YouTube was ripe for a video of its kind, but they’ve jumped off a sinking ship (i.e. EMI, or the entire music industry for that matter) unscathed.  My music technology students think OK Go’s music is lame, so they might say the real interesting factor is that the band did all this with mediocre music.  OK Go is a group of guys who make cool videos, and happen to play in a band and make music too.

Regardless of what one thinks of their music or artistry, they’re making it work in a revolutionary time in the arts.  As a professor who wishes for more commissions and patronage, I gots to give them props.

Information Overload or Filture Failure? Clay Shirky is awesome.

Here’s a video of a presentation by Clay Shirky on information overload vs. filter failure.  Worth watching.  Came across this on the popular blog Boing Boing. I find this an interesting contrast to Barry Schwartz’s ideas in his book The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less.

Les Paul and Mary Ford – My Tribute

I wanted to post this after having seen Jeff Beck and Imelda May pay tribute to the couple at the Grammys last Sunday. As the Grammys was a live event, I found the overall production/performance of most artists (including Taylor Swift – sorry) at the Grammys to be riveting. Not because the performances were amazing, but because it’s so rare to hear imperfections in the music and media I take in on a regular basis (yes, I don’t get out to live shows often these days). Missed cues, flat high notes, and awkward timing is what makes awards shows so fun to watch – you never know what you’re going to get.

Maybe that’s why I found this particular video of Les Paul and Mary Ford to be so interesting. I understand that in working with a tape recorder, Les Paul and Mary Ford would probably be the first to say that they’ve done countless takes to get things right. That said, if you watch them do a demo of their recording process, there is a clear sense of polish and discipline to their approach that makes it look easy. To me, it shows not that these guys worked harder than people do now, but that they had to out of necessity.

Nothing against current artists (especially Jeff Beck and Imelda May, who sounded great), but generally speaking, I think the rise of recording engineering virtuosity and efficiency has dovetailed with a decline in performance precision. As studios can quickly edit multiple takes together to create a flawless track, it puts less pressure on artists to sound awesome live. Most still do sound awesome live, but I think the change of recording technology itself has driven the changes in performance proficiency.

Finally, not to make an example of Taylor Swift’s poor performance at the Grammy’s, but I think she is a great example of the contemporary successful musician: doing a lot of things well, but maybe not doing one thing amazingly well. She’s been a pretty busy bee, and is more of an impresario than a songwriter. Writing her own songs, yes, but then recording them in the studio, working on the accompanying music videos, appearing on Saturday Night Live, appearing in commercials, not to mention the touring and all the trimmings that go along with establishing a brand. Again, not that Les Paul & Mary Ford weren’t establishing themselves with a multi-pronged approach (I mean, I guess Les Paul did that electric guitar-making thing along with his loop-recording innovations…), but you get the idea. We may sometimes have unrealistic expectations of our stars.

M03 Music Technology – some reading links

How Digital Audio Works (Please read this by Wednesday 1/13.  Well worth reading in its entirety.)

Dan Hosken, Computer Hardware

Dan Hosken, Computer Software

Joel Chadabe, The Electronic Century: Part I Early Instruments

Joel Chadabe, The Electronic Century: Part II Tales of the Tape

Joel Chadabe, The Electronic Century: Part III Computer and Synthesizers

Joel Chadabe, The Electronic Century: Part IV Seeds of the Future

Compression – M03

http://www.tenthegg.co.uk/tips/t018/

M03 – Editing Audio – DAW Assignment #1

Hi Class.  Grab this file for practice editing audio (specifically speech).  You’ll need to insert a username and password to get it off my ftp, so to go onto Blackboard for that information.  There you’ll also find details about the assignment, including instructions and suggestions for proceeding.

Here’s the link:

ftp://shock.dreamhost.com/Obama_School.mp3

Musicianship / Theory 2

Click here to get the PSS sheet.

Click here to download your dictation/theory assignment for Monday. Here’s the deal: this melody is in E minor.  Your assignment is to write the melody (8 measures, in duple meter) and the bass line to your best ability, then write what the Roman numerals are implied (or what you hear).  This will be handed in at the beginning of Theory 2 at 1pm this Monday.

Music Technology

Here’s the Survey Monkey link.

Please do it!

Here’s where you can get the Max/MSP license:

http://cycling74.com/purchase/discounts

Here’s where you can get the CDs.

Music Analysis

Hi class:

Go to http://songza.fm/nb23 to access my playlist.

Oh, and you can download the syllabus here.